A year after all the stress of coming up with enough cash and qualifying for a massive loan to buy a house in Palo Alto because of its good schools, I’m no longer sure that that remains a valid reason. When we moved out of China, we were escaping not just the smog but also the boot-camp style schools more appropriate for training GI Joes than nurturing children. I was naively optimistic that Palo Alto, the heart of Silicon Valley, a hub for revolutionary innovations that have swept the world, would surely offer the perfect education. But the more we’ve been here, but more dubious I’ve become about the alleged excellence of the Palo Alto schools (I’m referring to the public schools. But there may be similarities with some of the private schools as well).
At first I thought the problem was with the mismatch between lax elementary schools with uber-competitive high schools. Supposedly some elementary schools in the district are more academic, but least with our current school, the kids are not being adequately prepared to face that kind of competitiveness down the road. It’s as if they will be expected to run a marathon, but they get no training before the big day. Initially I wanted to believe that the educators here knew what they were doing--perhaps this was how elementary schools should be, relaxed without much discipline so the children can enjoy school more. But then the lack of discipline, or maybe the lack of emphasis on good work ethics is a more apt way to put it, started to be rather disconcerting.
For the past month I’ve caught Jojo, my third grader, not doing his homework multiple times. I must admit that I flipped out more than I needed to, but a kid who is not doing his homework! That’s a sure path leading not only to an Asian F but an actual F! I asked him why he was so derelict, and he said that the teachers here weren’t strict. If he didn’t turn in his homework, he could do it the next day, or the day after, or even never, and the teacher wouldn’t do anything about it. He even reasoned with me that since the homework here was so simple, he wasn’t causing himself harm by neglecting it. This was in stark contrast with how conscientious he was as a student in China.
In first grade at Jojo’s Chinese school, the kids were required to memorize these long arduous historical poems for their semester-end exam. I didn’t buy into all this rote memorization, especially of things that they hardly understood. And the kids were given a very short lead time to do it. When Jojo asked me to help him with the memorization, I told him to forget it and to go to bed. He became visibly distressed and said kids who didn’t get a perfect score would have to repeat the test until they did, and everyday those who didn’t pass the test had their names on the board. It would be humiliating! I told him that it wasn’t going to do him any good to memorize things he didn’t understand and was going to forget as soon as the test was over, and that he needed to go to bed, more firmly this time. He reluctantly obeyed. However, half an hour later, as I walked past our spare bedroom that also served as a study, I noticed him crouched in a corner, stealthily but dutifully memorizing the poems on his own. He made sure that he received a perfect score on the first try, even when I was unsupportive.
If I had wanted the kids better prepared for stressful times ahead in high school, we should have stayed with the Chinese school system. But Chinese schools use too much harsh discipline to make sure the kids do as they should, and over time it really kills the joy of learning. Except our school here doesn’t seem to foster a joy for learning either. The kids’ last year here was hard, because they were “fresh off the boat” and spoke no English, so they faced a steep learning curve (and they had better teachers). But this year, since they had caught up on the language, they became bored in school. New material is taught at a crawling rate, and not much is done for kids who yearn to do more. I was in the classroom a lot last year; the kids here had abysmal math skills, and those who were good at math learned it not in the classrooms but from outside tutors or parents. Being privately tutored isn’t something unique to our school but a district-wide phenomenon, and when I was finally clued in about this, it felt like the ultimate betrayal that all but destroyed my faith in our school district.
Engaging a private tutor here is like doping in sports: everyone’s heard of everyone else doing it, a lot, but nobody is doing it himself. However, it is clear that tutoring must be a thriving business because of all these learning centers that have sprung up around town like mushrooms after the first spring rain, and that’s not counting all the freelance tutors out there. Sometimes the kid will let it slip--that his tutor taught him how to do something differently. Or the mom will confess, if you get close enough (which I haven’t--I’ve only been told of other parents doing it, never the parents I talk to directly). If not tutoring, then I suspect it’s some other form of learning outside the school, be it an especially motivated child on her own, or parents stepping in as tutors. Otherwise I find it hard to explain how these kids catch up when they’ve received so little instruction in school. I would love to find out just how many kids engage in some form of learning outside the school and how much they get from these venues versus school. Some parents have even mused that perhaps so little learning happens in school because the teachers are well-aware of how much everyone is doing outside the classroom, so why bother? Other parents claim that they love the schools here--what a great opportunity for the kids to play together, right before they are whisked off to a myriad of after school activities, where actual learning takes place. What is especially sinister about private tutoring is that it widens the gap between the haves and the have nots. Kids whose families can’t afford tutoring are counting on the schools to provide them with a quality education, but in reality the schools may be failing them, and making it even more difficult for them to compete with their wealthier peers.
I have realized that we had left one pressurized and stressful school environment and jumped into another, but the difference is that in China, for the most part the schools provide a systematic way to bloat the kids with knowledge and basic skills, whereas here parents need to come up with private solutions to supplement their academically undernourished kids. This also serves as a rudely short explanation for why Chinese kids tend to be very cookie cutter and more uniformly good at school while American kids are much differentiated, with a few blindingly brilliant stars atop mostly middling underachievers. At least in China, the system, though harsh, puts the squeeze on everyone, so it is actually somewhat more equalized and gives the poor kids a fighting chance if they are willing to work hard (probably suffocating a few Jobs and Zuckerbergs along the way). The thought that after paying an arm and a leg for a house and tens of thousands for property tax each year, that I would have to dish out more money still to hire private tutors sickens me. And that’s not even considering the possibility of needing psychological counseling when the kids are in high school, because then school gets intolerably stressful, either for them or for their friends, or so we’ve heard. Furthermore, the kids are not utilizing their time efficiently at school and must continue with more work after school. I have become increasingly suspicious that I had suffered a classic case of mistaking correlation for causation, that a school set in an affluent neighborhood will always be rated highly because the parents make sure the kids do well. Our schools here aren’t bad, but just no better than schools in any Middleclasstown, USA, and come with much much MUCH more expensive real estate.
In the recent article on Palo Alto teen suicides in The Atlantic, the reporter touches upon what everyone thinks but is too politically correct to say out loud, that it is the Asian tiger moms who have made Bay Area schools ultra competitive. I understand this sentiment, as I have experienced first hand just how important prestige is to the Chinese. Where one has gone to school or employed for work becomes too large a portion of a Chinese person’s identity, as I’ve noticed far too many weibo (Chinese twitter) or wechat aliases with the likes of “Harvard_Liu” or “Yale_Li” or even “Harvard Mom”, as gaining prestige through name brands is a sure way to bring honor to the entire family. When I was working in China, I was always introduced by the name of my college alma mater, sometimes even before my own. In my Silicon Valley Chinese parent wechat groups, there have been somber and self-reflective moments after the recent suicides, but those quickly gave way to congratulations to parents whose kids have gained admissions to the Ivies or Stanford and reposts on how to become one of those parents. These parents are not the poor immigrants of yesteryear--they have the will and the means to launch their kids into uber achievers who make the stereotype of nerdy, socially awkward Asians only making the grades outdated. These kids are typically not just well-rounded but often also have what is considered a “spike” in college admissions-speak, may it be achievement in an instrument, charitable efforts or a STEM competition, at the national or even international level. These parents and their children certainly up the ante in the gladiatorial academic scene here.
While the increase of the Asian population may be the most visible change to the Bay Area demographics related to academic competitiveness, they are not solely to blame. I suspect there are other changes as well. What about the increase of the proportion of population with advanced degrees from prestigious universities all around the globe? Prosperous parents (as evidenced by another article from The Atlantic) of all shapes and form tend to push their kids to be like themselves. The Chinese moms in my group argue that the non-Asian parent here are just as cutthroat when it comes to pushing their kids and admit they are in awe of how much (usually) non-Asian parents push their kids to do competitive sports at all ages even at the risk of harm and injury, as data have shown an increase in sports-related injuries at younger ages. I’ve heard of multiple weekly practices plus out-of-town weekend competitions for elementary school kids. When I looked into enrolling my eight year old Jojo in soccer, I could not find an appropriate class--he was three years too late into the game.
It seems that the Bay Area schools are bound to be competitive and stressful, more so than other comparable schools around the nation, because they are in an area that attracts Asians, wealth, and talent (and sometimes all in the same person). Perhaps elementary schools here are lax because everyone is preparing for the race privately, and since the stakes are low, the tiger moms (of all backgrounds) and their cubs haven’t bared their sharp teeth yet. And I’ve only seen our school, so my viewpoint is admittedly narrow. Who knows, maybe the other elementary schools are already drilling their kids on the quadratic equation and the Pythagorean theorem. I could look to transfer my kids into a more academic school, but that gave me pause. Would that provide the excellent education that I’ve been seeking? Did I even have a clear idea what an excellent education looked like, after all this time?
In the course of jotting down my thoughts I have also been playing my own devil’s advocate and examining my assumptions. It seems that a lot of people say the high schools here are stressful, but what if they are a vocal minority? People who don’t find school stressful probably aren’t going to come out and risk the wrath of others by admitting so. I would need more exploration there to draw my own conclusions. But would my conclusion, either way, ease my original discontent with the schools here? I get the sense that the stress is largely related to winning the few coveted spots to highly selective colleges, and the competition here is especially ruthless because there is an over-abundance of qualified and driven kids (and parents). But suppose that my kids can actually win the academic arms race to Prestige U, does that mean they got a good education? While we certainly don’t mind getting my kids into Prestige U, we’ve always known that that cannot be the ultimate goal we set for their education, else we would have moved to another part of the country where the competition was easier to swallow. I wanted a solid education for my kids, regardless of where they end up going to college, but I had failed to examine whether Palo Alto schools actually provided one, taking too much stock in their competitiveness and US News rankings. A person is in school for 12+ years; that is a scarily long time to waste if she is just doing school but not getting an education, too scary to not think things through more carefully.
So, I am back to the drawing board and I plan to look at things more deeply. I had contemplated reaching out to the highschoolers here to get a sense of their experience, but I think I will first read School of Dreams, which is about a similarly competitive high school in the Los Angeles Area named Whitney High. I’ve also had multiple conversations with friends about what they thought of their education, and while they were able to pinpoint which segment of their education they deemed most enlightening, often they failed to articulate what it was that made it so. I have thought deeply about my own experience and I regret to say that even though I had attended Prestige U myself, I was too foolish to really take advantage of it. I was doing school, a continuation of a habit that I had acquired and even perfected 12 years prior to that. I didn’t feel like a somewhat educated person until I had graduated from business school, and that was mostly due to the high quality of teaching there, not necessarily because I had become wiser. I will read about how children are educated historically and how education has evolved with time. I plan to document my findings, thoughts, and conclusions as I try to define what constitutes an excellent education in our time, and maybe more specifically for my kids, though I haven’t decided whether I will publish them. If you were patient enough to read all the way to the end, will you please share your thoughts and experience about your or your kids’ education, or education in general, here or privately with me?
Note: I had intended to post this before my decision to home school, but my thoughts were occurring at a faster rate than I can document so I kept revising and never felt I was able to fully capture all of my observations and thoughts. There were a lot of multidimensional nitty gritty details to our experiences with our school/school district here that I am not able to include (or else bore you to death, if I haven’t already). I was also afraid of inciting too much controversy, thus shattering the submissive little Asian girl stereotype I’ve worked hard to foster (OK, not really, I’ve just become less comfortable putting my thoughts out there for all to see as I’ve grown older). My decision to home school is actually mostly due to Jojo’s health, so my expectations are low. Even if he doesn’t progress academically but improves his health during this time I would consider it a win. But as I started to look into home schooling, it just became more attractive the more I found out about it. Trying it out for a semester here in CA is also very low risk, so it’s not nearly as dramatic as some people think it is. Currently I don’t plan on doing it for too long, but we shall see. Thank you for reading.